Cathay Williams
In reviewCathay Williams was a formerly enslaved Black woman who enlisted in the United States Army in 1866 under the name William Cathay and served for nearly two years in the 38th U.S. Infantry, one of the Buffalo Soldier regiments. She built a military career in direct defiance of racial and gender barriers, making herself part of the first generation of Black regular Army soldiers in the post–Civil War West. Her enlistment and service are documented in Army records and in an 1876 interview in the St. Louis Daily Times, yet standard histories long treated her either as a legend or as a side note. The archive centers her decision to sign up, her work in uniform, and what her story shows about Black women’s determination to claim the rights of soldiers even when law and custom tried to exclude them.
1.Enslavement, Civil War service and the decision to enlist
Cathay Williams was born enslaved near Independence, Missouri, around 1844. During the Civil War she was taken into service with Union forces, working as a cook and laundress for officers, including General Philip Sheridan, and accompanying the army through campaigns in Arkansas, Louisiana and Georgia.
In that role she saw the inner workings of military life and the transformation of enslaved people into soldiers in the United States Colored Troops. When Congress authorized Black enlistment in the regular peacetime army after the war, Williams recognized a path to wages, mobility and a claim on the state she had served in bondage.
Her choice to enlist was grounded in this experience: she knew the army’s routines, understood its pay system, and saw soldiering as a route out of the precarious post‑emancipation economy. The archive treats this decision as an assertion of authorship over her own labor and future.
2.Enlistment as “William Cathay” in the 38th U.S. Infantry
In November 1866, Williams enlisted in the United States Army in St. Louis under the name William Cathay. Despite regulations barring women from the ranks, the enlistment surgeon cleared her, either failing to detect her sex or choosing not to expose it.
She was assigned to Company A of the 38th U.S. Infantry, one of the Black regiments later known as Buffalo Soldiers, and sent to posts in the Southwest, including New Mexico. Her duties, as she recounted in her 1876 St. Louis Daily Times interview, included cooking, laundry and occasional guard or other routine tasks alongside male soldiers.
Army muster rolls and discharge papers confirm her presence in the regiment and her service until her honorable discharge in October 1868 on medical grounds. These records place her not in myth but in the official file of the United States Army.
3.Service, illness and discharge
Williams’s time with the 38th Infantry was marked by the harsh conditions faced by Black troops in the West: long marches, inadequate supplies and exposure to disease. She reported contracting smallpox and suffering other illnesses that eventually led the regimental surgeon to declare her unfit for service.
Her honorable discharge acknowledged her as a soldier who had fulfilled her term until sickness intervened. The archive emphasizes that the discharge did not punish her for her sex; it recognized her as a member of the regiment, which underscores the reality of her service.
After leaving the army, Williams lived in various Western towns and ultimately in Colorado, supporting herself through domestic work and other labor. In later years she would seek a soldier’s pension, asserting her right as a veteran — another act that confirms how she understood her own status.
4.Pension denial and institutional erasure
In the 1890s, Williams applied for a disability pension based on her army service. The Pension Bureau investigated and confirmed her prior enlistment but denied the claim, asserting that she was not disabled in ways that met the statute’s requirements.
The denial reflects both the narrow legal standards and the broader reluctance of federal institutions to recognize Black women veterans. Although her service was acknowledged, the state refused to translate it into material support, effectively erasing her from the economic benefits other soldiers received.
Mainstream military histories for decades omitted her entirely or mentioned her in passing as a curiosity — a woman who “masqueraded” as a man — without situating her among Black soldiers claiming land, pensions and status in the postwar West. The archive identifies this omission as a product of gender and race bias, not of any ambiguity in the record of her enlistment.
5.Rediscovery in Black scholarship and the Buffalo Soldier story
Williams’s story resurfaced through Black‑authored scholarship on the Buffalo Soldiers, which drew on the St. Louis Daily Times interview, army records and oral histories to reconstruct her life. Historians working in Black archives and local collections placed her alongside male Buffalo Soldiers, arguing that her presence expanded the meaning of Black military service.
These works challenge narratives that cast her as an exception and instead read her enlistment as part of a broader pattern: Black women seeking roles in the military and federal service despite formal exclusion, using disguise, non‑combat support roles and legal petitions to claim space.
The archive draws on this scholarship to situate Williams as a soldier whose actions helped define what Black citizenship and service could look like, decades before women’s formal integration into the army.
6.Legacy and ongoing misrepresentation
Today, popular retellings often frame Cathay Williams as “the only female Buffalo Soldier” or as a novelty in lists of historical curiosities, flattening her story to a single fact. Such framing obscures the substantive content of her service and the structural barriers she confronted.
By centering her agency — her decision to enlist, her endurance in the West, her pension claim — the archive restores her to the broader narrative of Black military authorship. She stands as evidence that Black women were not simply excluded from the post‑Civil War army; they actively contested that exclusion and, in Williams’s case, succeeded in entering the rolls.
Her life calls for a revision of Buffalo Soldier histories that have focused almost exclusively on men, and it demands that veteran status be defined by documented service rather than by gender norms of the era.
The archive holds Cathay Williams as a United States soldier and a participant in the making of the Buffalo Soldier legacy, not as a mere anomaly. Her enlistment was a conscious act of self‑determination by a Black woman who had survived enslavement and war and insisted on entering the Army’s rolls despite its rules. Where the dominant narrative treats her gender disguise as the whole story, the archive emphasizes her service, her repeated reenlistment efforts and her standing among Black veterans of the Indian Wars.
The family archive is admissible here. Photographs, letters, deeds, church programs, funeral bulletins, business records, recordings — the things that were kept when no institution was keeping them. A keeper reviews everything before it is admitted, and your name stays on it.