A Black’s Reference WorkBlack’s Encyclopedia
Search the record…
Black’s Dictionary ↗Sign in
Archive / Language & Speech / Boy (term of address)
RecordThe Floor HistoryCite this record

Boy (term of address)

Verified record
The word aimed at Black American men: context, resistance, and the record in law.
From Black’s Encyclopedia, the sourced record. Catalog BE-1857-0051.
Boy (term of address)
FunctionSubordinating address, slavery through Jim Crow
Refused by“Call me mister” · I AM A MAN, Memphis 1968
In lawAsh v. Tyson Foods, 546 U.S. 454 (2006)
AttributionContext record · kept in the Black American account
Part of the Language & Speech portal

For most of American history, boy addressed to a Black man was not a description of age. It was an instrument: a word that denied adulthood, rank, and the honorifics white men exchanged as a matter of course.[1] This record keeps the context. The word's full linguistic file lives at our sister work, Black's Dictionary.

Contents
1.The grammar of subordination
2.The word in court
3.Setting the record straight
5.References

1.The grammar of subordination

Under slavery and Jim Crow, a Black man of any age could be addressed as boy by any white speaker, while Mister, Sir, and surnames were withheld by custom and often by rule.[1] The refusal became its own tradition of resistance. When the Memphis sanitation workers struck in 1968, the signs they carried read I AM A MAN: four words answering a lifetime of one.[2]

2.The word in court

The word's meaning was eventually argued before the United States Supreme Court. In Ash v. Tyson Foods (2006), the Court held that a supervisor's use of boy toward Black employees could itself evidence racial discrimination, rejecting the lower court's rule that the word required a racial modifier to insult.[3] The law arrived at what every Black grandfather already knew: the meaning was never in the modifier. It was in the aim.

The standing accountThe record’s position · stands until disproven with primary evidence

The meaning of an address is set by its use, and the use is documented: a century of testimony, a labor movement's signage, and a Supreme Court holding.[1][3] The archive holds the word's history as settled and files claims of neutrality under the false narrative above.

Filed under the doctrine of the standing account. Challenges are heard on the Floor, primary evidence in hand. Erasure is not evidence.

3.Setting the record straight

The mainstream reading treats the word as neutral and the objection as oversensitivity. The documentary record, from plantation account books to a 2006 Supreme Court opinion, says otherwise.[3]

The claim
It just means a young male. People hear insult where none is meant.
False
The record
Context is the record. A century of testimony, a labor movement's signage, and a Supreme Court holding document boy as a deliberate instrument of subordination when aimed at Black men.

This is what a context record is for. A dictionary can say what a word denotes. Only the archive can say what it did, to whom, and on whose authority that history is kept.

Bring evidence to this record
Hold a photograph? A deed? A program from that night?

The family archive is admissible here. Photographs, letters, deeds, church programs, funeral bulletins, business records, recordings — the things that were kept when no institution was keeping them. A keeper reviews everything before it is admitted, and your name stays on it.

4.See also

CowboyHistory & Migration
African American Vernacular EnglishLanguage & Speech
The Great MigrationHistory & Migration

5.References

[1]Estes, Steve. I Am a Man! Race, Manhood, and the Civil Rights Movement. UNC Press, 2005.
[2]Honey, Michael K. Going Down Jericho Road: The Memphis Strike, Martin Luther King's Last Campaign. W. W. Norton, 2007.
[3]Ash v. Tyson Foods, Inc., 546 U.S. 454 (2006).
Every claim in this record traces to a numbered source. Unsourced additions are returned to their author. That is the standard.
Strengthen this record
Hold a source, a link, or a correction? The record takes help from anyone. The keepers verify in the open, and the record credits you if it holds.
CategoriesLanguage & SpeechJim CrowLawThe record, corrected
Last revised June 2, 2026 by @marcusfromthesouthside · 11 revisionsConsensus 96% · text under the Black’s Record License; sources remain with their authors.